What you probably want from antix is to just install xfce. gnome 2 was great, its a pity debian supported mate as poorly as they did (i think it was as political as it was technical.) Most of the configuration utilities im familiar with in ubuntu are tied to the desktop environment- i have had very little luck running kde since it went to 4.x, 3.x was solid. on the other hand, in the majority of situations repairing grub is one or two steps (or used to be, prior to grub 2.) going back to the menu when booting doesnt happen does seem like a step in the right direction though. no one who is clever enough to develop it is likely to be comfortable with it. The problem with something like a very"smart" repair-grub is that it can only be smart about a fixed number of situations. note that i do not work on any public version of antix (though i have a script that can modify my copy of it automatically.) im not joking, i would find that information interesting.
most of the things that make debian or ubuntu user-friendly (synaptic for example) are included.įeel free to pm me a list of anything you find in ubuntu (or any other distro) that would make antix easier to use. its a fairly lightweight distro, which means that some things that add layers and layers of bloat (and only a little bit of extra user-friendliness) get thrown out. Personal opinion: antix is pretty friendly, i do not consider it an"experts only" distro. path, which is fine for examining the contents but you probably dont want to try to install things that way. if the deps are not there, it will not succeed.Īn aside: dpkg-deb -x package-name. it actually calls dpkg to install them.ĭpkg -i will install packages, and deps if they are included. Apt-get install will retrieve package and deps.
0 kommentar(er)
